The crypto industry is rife with scandal, scams, rug pulls, shady characters and money-grabbing celebrities. The technology became the fundamental building block for world-changing concepts like NFTs and Web3 and other less-savory practices like helping organized crime move money and pay for illegal activities. Even the cases where it did something "well" have proven tainted — just look at golden boy Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of FTX, or Binance, which is now under investigation for alleged illegal practices, including fraud.
Everything remotely crypto-connected should be met with skepticism. Every new character who enters the picture claiming to “change the world” should be met with distrust until proven otherwise. None more so than the newest project on the scene, one that wants to scan your eyeballs to prove your “humanness” in return for crypto.
What could go wrong?
Worldcoin is a project co-founded by Sam Altman, the chief executive of the ChatGPT developer OpenAI. The ambitions are lofty — how else will you suck up that sweet VC money, of which Worldcoin has already raised $115 million — with the moonshot being to “enable global democratic processes” and eventually fund a universal basic income. The pitch includes the whole Buzzword Bingo card. The first line of the Whitepaper reads, “Worldcoin was founded with the mission of creating a globally-inclusive identity and financial network, owned by the majority of humanity.” Across the homepage, all the others are present; community, ownership and blockchain protocol. Check, check, check.
The project works as follows. Go to a location where an “orb” is present (the orb is the bowling ball-esque device in the feature image, without the devil horns and tail, obviously) and have it scan your eyeballs. This creates a “World ID,” which Worldcoin describes as a digital passport proving you are unique and real while remaining anonymous. In exchange, you’re granted 25 Worldcoin tokens, equivalent to approximately £40, which you can access in your crypto wallet through your smartphone. Even that figure is debatable. CoinMarketCap puts the worth of one Worldcoin token at… wait for it… $0.01309.
On the one hand, there is some logic behind what the project aims to achieve. With A.I. continuing to blur the lines between what is real and what is generated, a system that could identify and validate actual human beings has merit. In theory, this “proof of personhood” could give the individual the ability to assert they are a real person and different from another person without revealing their real-world identity. If applied to other systems and platforms — banking or social media — it could combat the AI models making it harder to separate the humans from the bots. That’s a big if; it’s rare these projects ever find a tangible use case.
On the other hand, you’ve just given your iris scan, something unique to you, to a privately owned crypto company, for the paltry sum of £40. Let me drive it home; the crypto landscape is full of bad characters and bad actors. Do we think handing billions of people's biometric data to a company operating in an almost unregulated industry sounds like a good idea? No, it’s a fucking terrible idea and certainly a recipe for a dystopian nightmare.
There are numerous reasons to distrust the project:
Tools for Humanity (the company behind Worldcoin) is another crypto firm pivoting to A.I. to propel digital currencies back to relevance after a miserable 18 months of market crashes and bankruptcies.
Sam Altman's previous venture, OpenAI, was trained on data from people and companies without permission.
The goal of the project - to protect humanity from A.I. - makes no sense when Altman is still involved with OpenAI. It's much like those who campaign for regulation on A.I.; it's not to protect us, it's to protect the advantage they have.
Despite the promise of equitably distributed currency, Tools for Humanity has said about a quarter of its new digital coins are already earmarked for venture investors and other company insiders.
The terms and conditions say it all; there will be no refund or compensation if digital tokens are stolen by “hackers or other malicious groups” or if there is an “intentional or unintentional bug” on the open-source software they use. In other words, if your eyeballs are stolen, well, we hope your Worldcoin tokens provide some comfort, even when they almost certainly become worthless.
In a glimmer of hope, some agencies are at least concerned about the population giving up its identity so easily. The UK data watchdog, the Information Commissioner’s Office, is “making further inquiries.” Privacy campaign group, Big Brother Watch, has flagged the risk of biometric data being hacked or exploited. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) argues that despite receiving free tokens, users are paying a high price for the potential risks of hacking and exploiting their biometric data. EPIC counsel Jake Wiener warned of the consequences: "Mass collections of biometrics like Worldcoin threaten people’s privacy on a grand scale, both if the company misuses the information it collects, and if that data is stolen.” Madeleine Stone, a senior advocacy officer, told Reuters: “Digital ID systems increase state and corporate control over individuals’ lives and rarely live up to the extraordinary benefits technocrats tend to attribute to them.”
It's mental that this project even got off the ground; it's insane that it already has over 2 million "unique humans" in its network. The past few years of crypto are the biggest red flag you could ask for. Even before that, we learned the hard way from social media that our data shouldn't be a free-for-all for companies to exploit. We should do everything we can to protect it and be more selective about who and how we share it. And yet, the moment “free money” is on offer, people are giving up their identity without so much as a second thought, hoping that those 25 tokens will be worth what, $5,000? $10,000? If Worldcoin goes tits up or gets hacked — and you bet it will be on the radar now — the consequences are not worth thinking about, and no amount of money will be worth paying them.
I'm going nowhere near that orb.
Hello Stephen, I would like to point out a few misconceptions about your article. First of all, you referenced the wrong token in CoinMarketCap as WorldCoin (WDC), whereas the actuall token of Sam Altman's project is Worldcoin (WLD), which value by the time I am writing this is approximately US$ 1,46. It is important to keep in mind that WDC and WLD are two completely different criptocurrencies from different projects that do not share any particular actor. Second, your biometric data privacy concerns are irrational and profoundly alarmist , much like the whole media strategy to attract reader's attention through "shocking sentences" and poorly researched information of what the project is really about. Paraphrasing the official Worldcoin whitepaper at the "Orb Privacy" section, you can read: "The Orb checks that you are real and that you have not signed up before. It does this by capturing and processing images of you and your unique iris pattern.
Since no two people have the same iris pattern and these patterns are very hard to fake, the Orb can accurately tell you apart from everyone else without having to collect any other information about you — not even your name.
Importantly, the images of you and your iris pattern are permanently deleted as soon as you have signed up, unless you opt in to Data Custody to reduce the number of times you may need to go back to an Orb. Either way, the images are not connected to your Worldcoin tokens, transactions, or World ID."
Further in the document some essential information that is rarely covered by the mainstream media about this topic, including your own article, appears as:
"Biometric data never leaves the orb. Once you’ve signed up, it’s permanently deleted.
Your biometric data is first processed locally on the Orb and then permanently deleted. The only data that remains is your iris code. This iris code is a set of numbers generated by the Orb and is not linked to your wallet or any of your personal information. As a result, it really tells us — and everyone else — nothing about you. All it does is stop you from being able to sign up again.
Since you are not required to provide personal information like your name, email address, physical address or phone number, this means that you can easily sign up without us ever knowing anything about you."
Furthermore, worldcoin is not about giving your iris data in exchange for 25 WLD. This is merely a functionality to provide an incentive for new users to get to know the project, and obviously, validate the technology in real world situations. Users that downloaded the World App can reserve some amount of WLD that is distributed in a regressively quantity, as described at the Tokenomics section in the Worldcoin whitepaper. Surely nobody can assure that this project is 100% accurate and that the actors involved actually have the objectives described by the whitepaper in mind. I am not in any way related to the Worldcoin project and do not possess substantial amounts of WLD. Everyone considering buying this token or getting involved in this project should be cautious and skeptical, just like with every other crypto endeavour. The purpose of this comment was to clarify some concerns and (for everyone reading this) provide truthful information that can (and you must) be validated by deepening your knowledge at the right sources.
For more information you can access the following links:
-Worldcoin token (WLD) at CoinMarketCap: https://coinmarketcap.com/link/currencies/worldcoin-org
-Worldcoin official website: https://worldcoin.org/
-Worldcoin whitepaper: https://whitepaper.worldcoin.org/
-Infotmations about the Orb and privacy: https://whitepaper.worldcoin.org/technical-implementation#the-orb
https://whitepaper.worldcoin.org/proof-of-personhood
-Worldcoin Tokenomics: https://whitepaper.wo
rldcoin.org/tokenomics